Grades and school have always been and will continue to be partnered. Though this is the case, educators must be compelled to look at how the grade impacts future behavior. Yes, the grade should represent mastery of a standard however, it should only be reserved for such. Additionally, if the goal is mastery, shouldn’t the grade reflect mastery when it is achieved? In my opinion, it should.
I believe in the A-B-C-Not Yet scale of grading. We really need to move away from the punitive measure of an ‘F’. I don’t believe there are students that wake up and come to school everyday just yearning for a failing grade. Quite the contrary. I believe we have students that have all kinds of struggles and insurmountable obstacles that contribute to their performance. I believe it is incumbent upon educators to find the reason, or hook, that stimulates their desire to perform.
Many times it can be as simple as giving the student a path to success. If a student has a miserable grade percentage and mathematically they cannot reach a passing grade, then they will not be motivated to do anything. On the other hand, if that same student with the same miserable grade is given a path to success through completing work and performing on mastery tests, then the path is and will continue to be available as a ‘chance’ to improve their grade. Failure can then be used as a learning device.
Anyone can attest to the fact that they too fear failure. Some handle it better than others. Most importantly, we need to see failure differently and address it with both courage and optimism. If we all can do that, we can obtain the success we desire and work toward.
Until next time...
Until next time...

No comments:
Post a Comment